The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
Blog Article
As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
How much sway case regulation holds may possibly change by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances in the current case. To explore this concept, take into account the following case law definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of the boy or girl usually do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
The plenty of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made obvious that police is free to take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-discipline duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
For that foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that website the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name to the ECL based about the criminal case are inconsistent with proven legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same kind of case.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[4]
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case legislation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may materialize several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of the High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement on the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
The uncovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings inside the Impugned order, after recording of evidence with the respective parties. Read more